Notice of a request to remove or modify a restrictive agreement must be: The developer may be allowed to enter the country to evaluate and ensure compliance with the agreement. An agreement under section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, which may be registered on title and may restrict the manner in which land is used or developed, is not a registered restrictive agreement. The above information does not apply to these agreements. With such significant penalties, each owner or potential owner should be informed of all alliances on their land. If the beneficiary land has been subdivided and redepartied, you may need to search the original plan of subdivision and previous titles to identify the beneficial owners. Although exclusion agreements are unenforceable today, they still exist in many original titles as “underlying documents,” and title insurance policies often contain exclusions that prevent such restrictions from being covered. It is not always easy to remove them from the chain of titles.  Since 2010, the Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project has found more than 500 restrictive agreements and deeds covering more than 20,000 properties in and around Seattle. In response, the Washington State Legislature passed a law that allows homeowners to “change” property records since Jan. 1, 2019, denying the offensive restriction.
 Mapping Inequality, a collaboration of three teams from four universities, identified restrictive agreements in different parts of the United States. .